EE ATTACHMENT FOR SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR ASSIGNMENT.
This assignment should be 3-5 pages in length and follow APA formatting. The title page and reference pages do not count towards final page count. An abstract is not needed for this paper, and will also not count towards final page count. This assignment should discuss your general understanding of your scores on each of the assessment instruments and interpretations of your scores. The content of your reflection should include:
- A description of your score(s)
- Brief interpretation of your score(s)
- Explanation of how you might use the instrument(s) in your career. Any concerns about implementing the instrument(s) with the population you will work with in your career?
- Any surprises? New discoveries about your personality/interests as they apply to your career journey/career selection?
Reflection Assignment #1 Instructions:
Go to the following web address to take the FREE online career assessment that is based on Carl Jung’s and Isabel Briggs Myers’ personality type theory: http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/jtypes2.asp
Follow the instructions on the screen, and answer the questions on your screen to obtain a 4 letter type formula according to Carl Jung’s and Isabel Briggs Myers’ typology, along with strengths and preferences and the description of your personality. One you obtain your scores, you will write a 3-5 page reflection paper and submit in the Assignments tab by the due date indicated in Elean and on the syllabus. This assignment should follow APA formatting. The title page and reference pages do not count towards final page count. An abstract is not needed for this paper, and will also not count towards final page count. This assignment should discuss your general understanding of your scores on each of the assessment instruments and interpretations of your scores. The content of your reflection should include:
- A description of your score(s)
- Brief interpretation of your score(s)
- Explanation of how you might use the instrument(s) in your career. Any concerns about implementing the instrument(s) with the population you will work with in your career?
- Any surprises? New discoveries about your personality/interests as they apply to your career journey/career selection?
Grading Rubric
Area 1) Content
- Excellent (5pts): Balanced presentation of relevant and legitimate information that clearly supports the purpose. Shows a thoughtful, in-depth analysis of the topic. Audiences gain important insights
- Good (3-4pts): Information provides reasonable support for the purpose of presentation; displays evidence of a basic analysis of the topic. Audiences gain some insights.
- Satisfactory (1-2pts): Information supports the purpose of presentation. Analysis is basic or general. Audiences gain few insights.
- Unacceptable (0pt): Analysis is vague or not evident. Audiences are confused or may be misinformed
Area 2) Organization
- Excellent (5pts): The ideas are arranged logically. They flow smoothly from one to another and are clearly linked to each other. Audiences can follow the line of reasoning.
- Good (3-4pts): The ideas are arranged logically. They are usually clearly linked to each other. For the most part, audiences can follow the line of reasoning.
- Satisfactory (1-2pts): In general, the ideas are arranged logically, although occasionally ideas fail to make sense together. Audiences are fairly clear about what presenter intends.
- Unacceptable (0pt): The ideas are not logically organized. Frequently, ideas fail to make sense together. Audiences cannot identify a line of reasoning and loses interest.
Area 3) Length
- Excellent (5pts): Paper/Presentation is the number of pages specified in the assignment
- Unacceptable (0pt): Paper has more or fewer pages than specified in the assignment.
Area 4) Use of Language
- Excellent (5pts): Compelling evidence from professionally legitimate sources is given to support claims.
- Good (3-4pts): Professionally legitimate sources that support claims are generally present for the most part.
- Satisfactory (1-2pts): Occasionally confused about the source of information.
- Unacceptable (0pt): No reference information.
Area 5) Other
- Rubric point: total [20pts]
- On-time Submission point: [50pts]
- At least 2 pages for each topical area: Medical [5pts], Functional [5pts], Assistive Tech [5pts], Resources [5pts] (total 20pts):
- APA Formatting: [5pts]
- Has Cover & Reference page: [2.5pts/each, total 5pts]
